What Can We Know about the Effectiveness of Coaching? A Meta-Analysis Based Only on Randomized Controlled Trials
What the research says
This review deliberately included only randomized controlled trials — the most rigorous design available, where people are randomly assigned to coaching or to a comparison group. Pooling 37 such trials with more than 2,500 participants, the authors found significant positive effects across leadership and personal development outcomes. In plain terms: even when you strip out the weaker study designs that tend to flatter results, coaching still works.
How it informs our coaching
It's why we work in structured programs rather than one-off conversations. The trials that show results use a defined process over time — so we contract for a series of sessions, set explicit goals at the outset, and review them at the end.